SOA Gain Ripple is caused by residual reflections from the SOA facets and should be as low as possible. In general, the facet reflectivity of an SOA device should be 0.01% or less to achieve a 20 dB gain.
The SOA Switching Time is measured as rise time and fall time, the typical switching time is in the order of nanoseconds. Switching time is a critical parameter when the SOA is used as switching function. Fig. 5 shows the typical switching time for InPhenix IPSAD1302 and IPSAD1502 devices where the rise time (from 20% to 80%) and fall time (from 80% to 20%) is about 500 pico seconds.
III. Wavelength Conversion Based on SOAs
All-optical wavelength conversion will become an essential function in future all-optical networks and photonic switching blocks. This feature can be realized through one of three techniques:
(1) Cross-Gain Modulation,
(2) Cross-Phase Modulation,
(3) Four-Wave Mixing using SOAs.
Wavelength Converters Based on Cross-Gain Modulation (XGM)
Amplification of an Input signal results in the carrier density depletion in an SOA. Optical gain in an SOA can be reduced by this carrier density depletion in high input power applications. This phenomenon distorts the transmitted signal for SOAs used as in-line amplifiers but it can be used to realize optical wavelength conversions (WCs). For this purpose, two signals, Pump (input signal, S) and Probe (converted output signal, C), are simultaneously injected into an SOA. The pump signal is amplitude modulation (AM) format while the probe is a continuous wave (CW).
When the Pump is in a low power state the SOA will not be saturated and therefore the probe will experience unsaturated gain. In a high power state the gain is saturated and the probe signal will experience a lower gain. The degree of gain decrease depends to a large extent on the pump power and the injection current applied to the amplifier. In this way, pump modulation is transferred to the probe with the signal being inverted. Figure 6 shows the principles of cross gain modulation using an SOA.
Co-propagation scheme

Fig. 6 Schematic of the co- and counter-propagation XGM wavelength conversion
principle.
As shown in Fig. 6, the input signal and the CW signal can be launched either in the co- or counter- propagating direction into an SOA. In the latter case an output filter can be avoided and it is also possible to convert the signals to the same wavelength. However, this counter-propagating configuration suffers from a smaller bandwidth as well as an enhanced amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise level compared to the co-propagating configuration. The XGM scheme has the advantage of being simple to realize and it can be polarization insensitive if the SOA is polarization insensitive. In order to increase the conversion efficiency for XGM, it is better to reduce the average signal power than to increase the probe power. However, there is a tradeoff between conversion efficiency and output extinction ratio. One major drawback is extinction ratio degradation for up-converted signals.
In summary, the attractions of XGM wavelength conversion devices lie in their simplicity, high conversion efficiency, polarization independence, and their insensitivity to the wavelength of the input data (provided it is within the SOA gain bandwidth). Polarization independence is only ensured if the SOA gain is designed to be polarization independent. The broadband nature of these devices makes them capable of transferring data from one wavelength to several other wavelengths in one device. This may potentially be useful in a wavelength-routed network for broadcast applications.
his can be a serious limitation in cascading such devices in an optical network. Another important drawback of XGM wavelength converters is the wavelength chirp induced on the target waveform. This wavelength chirp can severely limit the transmission distance.
Wavelength Converters Based on Cross-Phase Modulation (XPM)
To overcome the problems with extinction ratio degradation with the XGM scheme, the SOA converter can be used in a XPM mode (also called an interferometic mode for wavelength converters based on XPM). The XPM scheme relies on the dependency of the refractive index of the carrier density in the active region of the SOA. An incoming signal that depletes the carrier density will modulate the refractive index and thereby result in phase modulation of a CW signal coupled into the converter. As an example, a structure for a Mach-Zehnder interferometic converter is shown in Fig. 7.

Fig.7 Schematic and principle of operation for interferometic wavelength converters
based on XPM in symmetric configuration.
The XPM conversion scheme has the advantage of being very efficient compared to the XGM scheme. It also shows good performance for both up and down converted signals. In such a device the light is split into two paths containing SOAs and a relative phase shift is induced. When the light is recombined, constructive or destructive interference will occur depending on the phase difference between the two paths.
The state of the interferometer is typically set by adjusting the injection current in the two SOAs or by a separate phase tuning element in a passive waveguide. Thus, the first advantage for interferometeric wavelength converters over XGM is the capability to choose between inverting and non-inverting operation.
Additionally, the highly nonlinear behavior can result in reshaping of the incoming data, improvement of the extinction ratio, and redistribution of the noise on the input signal. These properties make this device partially regenerative and thereby increase its cascadability. Furthermore, the chirp characteristic of the wavelength-converted signal can be positive or negative depending on the interferometer bias point. By careful manipulation, the output chirp can be compensated by the dispersion of the fibers and therefore the transmission distance through dispersive fiber can be extended.
In summary, interferometic devices such as Mach-Zehnder interferometers utilizing SOA nonlinearities offer excellent performance in wavelength conversion applications. The main benefits are polarization and wavelength independence, low chirp, noninverting output, partial regeneration of the input, and high extinction ratio. Drawbacks are the restriction to amplitude modulation formats and complex control of the bias point due to the sharp transfer characteristics. Additional drawbacks for monolithically integrated SOA and MZ interferometers are compromises in the SOA design and the complex nature of fabrication.
Wavelength Converters Based on Four-Wave Mixing (FWM)
Four-wave mixing (FWM) is a nonlinear phenomenon that involves optical signals of three different
frequencies: